Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W510 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3067-A1
Memory	12.2 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120124
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '21 at 10:45
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31225 3,353 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 86.9 1-Core 81 2-Core 162 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 330 42% 318 Pts	64-Core 324 20% 324 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sapphire(174B 0630) 2GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	3.45% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 5.5 Parallax 4.6 3% 4.67 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 5 Splatting 4.6 4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.45% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 240GB SSD 240GB 2,181 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN4763 SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 397 392 401 68 19 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Read 468 Write 307 Mixed 388 SusWrite 279 81% 360 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 62.9 4K Mixed 34.7 122% 42.4 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 287 DQ Mixed 137 122% 179 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 931GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 188 186 189 188 190 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 175 Mixed 80.4 SusWrite 188 115% 157 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 113%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB 7,986 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 0302 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	5.16% Terrible	Read 26.6 Write 0.2 Mixed 2 SusWrite 0.8 6% 7.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.16% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB RMR5040ED58E9W1600 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Nanya NT2GC72B89B0NF-CG 14GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.6% Above average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 16.5 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16.6 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	4x
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples	2x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	2x

SSD
240GB SSD 240GBLexarBench 61%, 2,181 samples	2x
Raid 0 Volume 480GBIntelBench 105%, 11,256 samples	1x
M500 240GBCrucial $79Bench 77%, 31,779 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB RMR5040ED58E9W1600 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Nanya NT2GC72B89B0NF-CG 14GBHynixBench 50%, 3 samples	3x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 5,657 samples	2x
NT4GC72B8PB0NF-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 48%, 39 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16