Foxconn P55A Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemFoxconn P55A Series  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN P55A Series
Memory18.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091103
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 09 '21 at 15:06
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 78.4
2-Core 157
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 343
38% 296 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.4% Above average
Lighting 61.8
Reflection 72
Parallax 63.5
50% 65.8 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 63.9
Splatting 55.7
50% 62.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
295GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 43 44 43 44 44 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.9% Below average
Read 180
Write 149
Mixed 151
SusWrite 42.4
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 20.3
69% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 123
93% 125 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135
605GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 45 46 45 46 46 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.5% Average
Read 181
Write 151
Mixed 164
SusWrite 44.4
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 24.9
82% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 131
98% 131 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 116 126 119 119 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 123
Write 124
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 119
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 75%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 43 44 43 44 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 139
Write 101
Mixed 26
SusWrite 42.5
56% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.9
351% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 110%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
715GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 43 43 43 44 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 102
Write 98.2
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 41.8
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 61%
External USB3.0 1TB
567GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 29 30 29 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 33.6
Write 28.3
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 28.6
22% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 7.6
1,306% 7.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
39.1% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 11.5
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P55A Series Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Foxconn P55A Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $184
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback