Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Gaming 24%
Desktop 73%
Workstation 23%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateDec 09 '21 at 00:56
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 70.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 176
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 572
54% 446 Pts
64-Core 739
46% 739 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.5% Poor
Lighting 34.5
Reflection 37.9
Parallax 36.7
28% 36.4 fps
MRender 35.9
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 26
26% 33 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Ignite 240GB-$123
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM02.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 240 203 174 175 173 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 349
Write 341
Mixed 302
SusWrite 204
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 19.9
82% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 50.5
106% 213 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
328GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 76 75 75 75 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 42
Write 108
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 74.4
55% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.5
54% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Predator 2666 C13 2x8GB-$137
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 27.6
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 23
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 29%
Desktop 79%
Workstation 27%

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $346
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $199Nvidia RTX 4070 $499WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback