Toshiba SATELLITE C855-248

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C855-248  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime11.8 Days
Run DateDec 05 '21 at 13:54
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1000M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 78.6
1-Core 47.5
2-Core 92.8
48% 73 Pts
4-Core 88.8
8-Core 91.2
12% 90 Pts
64-Core 94.9
6% 94.9 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FB31) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.4 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
2% 2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.35%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$56
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF870400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 131 124 127 129 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 408
Write 304
Mixed 267
SusWrite 148
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 10.8
34% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 5.7
DQ Write 68.3
DQ Mixed 30.7
26% 34.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 55%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
380GB free
Firmware: AM003M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 75 77 75 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 53.7
Write 52.2
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 75.6
38% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CK0 Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 11
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE C855-248 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C855-248

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $56
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback