Toshiba SATELLITE C855-248

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C855-248 (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131001
Uptime	11.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '21 at 13:46
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 1000M 3,569 User benchmarks, average bench 42% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Memory 77.1 1-Core 47.8 2-Core 94.2 47% 73 Pts	4-Core 95.5 8-Core 93.7 13% 94.6 Pts	64-Core 93.1 6% 93.1 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz) 28,701 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FB31) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	1.35% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.13 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 1 Splatting 1.9 2% 2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.35% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 179GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF870400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 98 122 122 115 134 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 407 Write 308 Mixed 216 SusWrite 133 59% 266 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 16.2 4K Mixed 7.2 25% 9.3 MB/s	DQ Read 2.1 DQ Write 77.2 DQ Mixed 32.7 28% 37.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 55%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 380GB free Firmware: AM003M SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 76 77 74 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	36.9% Below average	Read 52.5 Write 54.2 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 76 38% 52.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CK0 Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF 6GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	41.6% Average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 13.8 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 11 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 86.1 46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C855-248 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C855-248

CPU
Celeron 1000MIntelBench 42%, 3,569 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	1x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5773DH0-CK0 Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF 6GBSamsungBench 35%, 6 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $35

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16