Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateDec 04 '21 at 22:22
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$130
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 90.8
1-Core 75.6
2-Core 219
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 440
59% 438 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48% Average
Lighting 58.6
Reflection 69
Parallax 61.3
48% 63 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 59.3
Splatting 53.8
49% 60.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 120GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 84 57 57 56 58 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 484
Write 431
Mixed 383
SusWrite 123
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 46
156% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 329
249% 336 MB/s
Poor: 95% Great: 135%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
22GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 489
Write 459
Mixed 365
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 96.6
4K Mixed 56.6
189% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 331
249% 333 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD My Book 1230 2TB
1TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 140 139 140 141 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 64.6
Write 64.7
Mixed 51.6
SusWrite 140
114% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 59%
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB
545GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
23% Poor
Read 45
Write 41.1
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 45.5
58% 42.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 29.5
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 26.2
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,337 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $741
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback