Asus X99-S

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-S (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170810
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 04 '22 at 09:09
Run Duration	247 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 81.7 1-Core 88.9 2-Core 164 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 611 58% 480 Pts	64-Core 757 47% 757 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 367A) CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Lighting 63.7 Reflection 62.4 Parallax 55.9 52% 60.7 fps	MRender 67.3 Gravity 66.5 Splatting 56.8 51% 63.5 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,988 Write 1,906 Mixed 1,380 391% 1,758 MB/s	4K Read 50.1 4K Write 91.5 4K Mixed 62.4 204% 68 MB/s	DQ Read 609 DQ Write 389 DQ Mixed 528 386% 509 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 217GB free Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 403 409 409 412 403 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Read 436 Write 409 Mixed 396 SusWrite 408 93% 412 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 73.3 4K Mixed 23.6 115% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 47.7 99% 198 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 100%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 112GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 155 156 155 155 155 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	85% Excellent	Read 406 Write 400 Mixed 378 SusWrite 189 77% 343 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 69.8 4K Mixed 42 141% 48.3 MB/s	DQ Read 314 DQ Write 284 DQ Mixed 343 245% 314 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 4x4GB 11,950 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 41.6 MC Write 41.9 MC Mixed 39.9 118% 41.1 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 19.3 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 77.4 52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-S Builds (Compare 390 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-S

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	211x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	81x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	41x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	52x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	32x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	26x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	29x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	15x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	14x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C15 4x4GBCorsairBench 89%, 2,538 samples	15x
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $774

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16