Shuttle SH55J

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemShuttle SH55J  (all builds)
MotherboardShuttle SH55J
Memory5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '21 at 18:27
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 154
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 363
38% 307 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.8% Below average
Lighting 37.4
Reflection 41.9
Parallax 37.3
30% 38.9 fps
MRender 50.8
Gravity 37.2
Splatting 39.5
34% 42.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 44 37 43 45 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.7% Average
Read 221
Write 227
Mixed 204
SusWrite 41.9
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 31.8
107% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 38.4
DQ Write 85.2
DQ Mixed 49.1
41% 57.6 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
63GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 45 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 38.5
Write 24.7
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 44.8
26% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.9% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 6.1
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SH55J Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Shuttle SH55J

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback