Shuttle SH55J

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Shuttle SH55J (all builds)
Motherboard	Shuttle SH55J
Memory	5.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110105
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '21 at 10:56
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	MDA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Memory 88.9 1-Core 73.5 2-Core 142 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 359 41% 318 Pts	64-Core 363 22% 363 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 462.96 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.5% Below average	Lighting 36.9 Reflection 41.9 Parallax 37.3 30% 38.7 fps	MRender 50.5 Gravity 37.5 Splatting 39.6 34% 42.5 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 37 37 32 30 31 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.4% Average	Read 234 Write 228 Mixed 206 SusWrite 34.5 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 46.2 4K Mixed 32.1 106% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 38.1 DQ Write 84.3 DQ Mixed 48.1 40% 56.8 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 67GB free Firmware: 3.AAK SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 38 34 30 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	Read 38.1 Write 27.4 Mixed 30 SusWrite 36.4 24% 33 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.6% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 6.3 21% 7.43 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 9 27% 9.43 GB/s	Latency 68.6 58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SH55J Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Shuttle SH55J

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	7x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	5x
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	4x
GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples	2x
GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples	2x

SSD
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	3x
MX500 250GBCrucial $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	2x
S128G 126GBSandiskBench 42%, 21,984 samples	1x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	9x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	8x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $195

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16