TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-17G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics63.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star Creator 17 A10SD
MotherboardMSI MS-17G3  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210305
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 28 '21 at 20:20
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 94.7
1-Core 134
2-Core 250
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 760
74% 609 Pts
64-Core 1,065
66% 1,065 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 89.9%
 Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
MSI(1462 12B7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 3275 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
63.6% Good
Lighting 77.4
Reflection 93.4
Parallax 74.1
63% 81.6 fps
MRender 99.5
Gravity 72.4
Splatting 69.7
65% 80.5 fps
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 63.6%
 Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AI1 512GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 96 74 81 103 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 877
Write 942
Mixed 811
SusWrite 114
154% 686 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 50.6
175% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 207
186% 278 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 110%
 Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85.6% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 24.3
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 22.7
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 85.6%
 Great: 106%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-17G3 Builds (Compare 709 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17G3

CPU
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples303x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples230x
Core i9-10980HKIntelBench 84%, 7,777 samples173x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples309x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples150x
RTX 2070S (Super Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 86%, 3,561 samples82x
SSD
PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00-1032 1TBWDCBench 252%, 11,331 samples225x
PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G-1032 512GBWDCBench 221%, 6,012 samples120x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TBSamsungBench 275%, 9,396 samples43x
RAM
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 88%, 37,566 samples148x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples99x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples79x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback