TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-17G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics65.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star Creator 17 A10SD
MotherboardMSI MS-17G3  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '21 at 14:48
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 140
2-Core 251
92% 162 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 818
81% 662 Pts
64-Core 1,075
66% 1,075 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 94.3%
 Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
MSI(1462 12B7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 3275 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.1% Good
Lighting 78.3
Reflection 94
Parallax 77.7
64% 83.3 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 76.1
Splatting 73.6
68% 84 fps
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 65.1%
 Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AI1 512GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 834 935 136 90 91 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 812
Write 935
Mixed 806
SusWrite 359
164% 728 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 55.6
186% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 414
DQ Mixed 217
196% 290 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 127%
 Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 24.2
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 38.9
SC Mixed 27.7
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 57.9
69% 57.9 ns
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 88.4%
 Great: 106%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-17G3 Builds (Compare 709 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17G3

CPU
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples303x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples230x
Core i9-10980HKIntelBench 84%, 7,777 samples173x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples309x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples150x
RTX 2070S (Super Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 86%, 3,561 samples82x
SSD
PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00-1032 1TBWDCBench 252%, 11,331 samples225x
PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G-1032 512GBWDCBench 221%, 6,012 samples120x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TBSamsungBench 275%, 9,396 samples43x
RAM
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 88%, 37,566 samples148x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples99x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples79x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback