Microelectronics GSeries

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics208% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicroelectronics GSeries  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star Z490-A PRO (MS-7C75)
Memory22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210420
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 27 '21 at 06:23
Run Duration331 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700K-$231
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 87.6
1-Core 145
2-Core 291
95% 175 Pts
4-Core 620
8-Core 1,100
104% 860 Pts
64-Core 1,681
104% 1,681 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
208% Outstanding
Lighting 306
Reflection 281
Parallax 304
250% 297 fps
MRender 349
Gravity 254
Splatting 186
206% 263 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 208%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1165 786 779 557 504 503 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 1,545
Write 1,701
Mixed 1,268
SusWrite 716
294% 1,307 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 77.3
285% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,475
DQ Write 1,112
DQ Mixed 1,214
929% 1,267 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 250%
Great: 276%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
806GB free
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 383 438 456 458 454 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 475
Mixed 394
SusWrite 409
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 50.3
176% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 258
217% 317 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 115%
Great: 117%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
291GB free
Firmware: UH4400RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 132 163 71 36 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 446
Write 368
Mixed 201
SusWrite 91.7
61% 277 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 15.1
41% 11.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 58%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
165GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2276 585 585 586 585 585 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2,495
Write 2,362
Mixed 1,634
SusWrite 867
411% 1,839 MB/s
4K Read 70.1
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 95.1
333% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,580
DQ Write 1,236
DQ Mixed 1,370
1,035% 1,396 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 318%
Great: 340%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
784GB free
Firmware: UH4400RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 5 80 25 59 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 436
Write 300
Mixed 205
SusWrite 86.8
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 10.1
64% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 74.6
DQ Mixed 12.4
32% 68.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 30.7
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 30.7
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GSeries Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

System: Microelectronics GSeries

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $880
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback