HP 700-165eg

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	64.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP 700-165eg (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141024
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '21 at 21:09
Run Duration	280 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Memory 67.6 1-Core 94 2-Core 178 64% 113 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 529 51% 421 Pts	64-Core 555 34% 555 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Zotac(19DA 2368) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1609 MHz, MLim: 1850 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.76 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	64.8% Good	Lighting 78.8 Reflection 106 Parallax 69.1 64% 84.7 fps	MRender 83 Gravity 85 Splatting 75.2 66% 81.1 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB 36,832 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA15.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 9.6 145 130 114 102 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	71% Very good	Read 434 Write 309 Mixed 322 SusWrite 120 66% 296 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 59.4 4K Mixed 32 118% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 50.1 85% 169 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 90%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 474GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 438 412 391 392 389 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	98.7% Outstanding	Read 430 Write 418 Mixed 359 SusWrite 408 91% 404 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 68.4 4K Mixed 41.7 132% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 333 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 267 220% 314 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9965525-033.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9965525-008.A00LF 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	46.5% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 15 46% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 15.3 42% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 700-165eg Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

System: HP 700-165eg

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	10x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $88Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	3x
GTX 760 (192-bit)NvidiaBench 20%, 10,656 samples	2x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	2x

SSD
INTENSO 128GBBench 65%, 3,345 samples	3x
CS900 120GBPNY $15Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	1x
840 Evo 1TBSamsung $199Bench 105%, 23,857 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 16GBSamsungBench 59%, 6 samples	3x
16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 12GBMicronBench 42%, 242 samples	2x
KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9965525-033.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9965525-008.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 51%, 5 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $163

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16