Lenovo 3209C54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 3209C54  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '21 at 14:28
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 166
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 281
40% 297 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3083) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.53% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 1.5
2% 1.83 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 1
Splatting 2
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.53%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X14c18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 337 302 147 165 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 387
Write 325
Mixed 315
SusWrite 229
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 29.3
99% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 175
133% 177 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
166GB free
Firmware: JC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 126 121 123 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 123
Write 117
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 123
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 70%
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB
204GB free
Firmware: 0106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 99 96 99 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 51.4
Mixed 47.9
SusWrite 97.9
53% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 53%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB
25GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 34 32 26 23 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 151
Write 26.2
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 27.3
69% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Mixed 0.8
75% 3.45 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
M1 Kingston 99U5403-002.A00LF Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4G1 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.5% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3209C54 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3209C54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback