Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Memory 86 1-Core 82.7 2-Core 165 66% 111 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 240 32% 242 Pts	64-Core 226 14% 226 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5770 37,602 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 03B6) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	7.8% Terrible	Lighting 14.5 Reflection 13.6 Parallax 13.2 12% 13.8 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 7.8% Great: 11%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25 14,710 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 139GB free Firmware: 1AC01113 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 113 Write 108 Mixed 57.5 68% 92.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	49.6% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 16.3 48% 17 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 15.5 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	4x
HD 7950AMD $290Bench 29%, 33,820 samples	4x
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	2x

SSD
SSDMCEAF180A4L 180GBIntelBench 58%, 41 samples	4x
Burst 240GBPatriotBench 73%, 26,886 samples	2x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x

RAM
78.B1GDE.9L10C 2x4GBApacerBench 47%, 67 samples	5x
99P5471-004.A01LF 9905474-043.A00LF Samsung M378B5673FH0-CF8 KY996D-ELD 12GBKingstonBench 38%, 2 samples	2x
GR1600D364L11/8G 075D GR1600D364L11/8G 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 32GBUnknownBench 48%, 4 samples	2x

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $312

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16