Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161227
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateAug 27 '17 at 10:35
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 76%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 92.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 214
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 714
65% 546 Pts
64-Core 717
44% 717 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15.9% Very poor
Lighting 6.67
Reflection 6.92
Parallax 5.91
5% 6.5 fps
MRender 44.3
Gravity 96
Splatting 6.52
36% 48.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ACSC4M512S25 507GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1026A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 381
Mixed 432
99% 443 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 37
146% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 71
110% 207 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 103
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.17
92% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
205GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 94.1
Write 83
Mixed 74.9
63% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.38
93% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2884 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
85.7% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 29
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 18.1
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO Builds (Compare 7,209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $707
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback