Medion Erazer i72000/C057

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	39.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Medion Erazer i72000/C057 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H110H4-CM2
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171214
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '21 at 16:16
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$60 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 74.9 1-Core 107 2-Core 212 73% 131 Pts	4-Core 416 8-Core 412 56% 414 Pts	64-Core 410 25% 410 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Elitegroup(1019 1029) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.80 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.7% Below average	Lighting 45.9 Reflection 66.5 Parallax 55.3 37% 55.9 fps	MRender 58 Gravity 52.9 Splatting 51.8 44% 54.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB 6,038 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT2101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 42 46 39 43 42 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	47.4% Average	Read 446 Write 44.2 Mixed 84.5 SusWrite 41.6 33% 154 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 15 4K Mixed 19.1 75% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 14.3 DQ Mixed 37.2 42% 76.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 59%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 849GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 101 102 103 102 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 89.1 Write 54.2 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 102 55% 74.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 2x8GB 1,126 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 18.4 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 20.3 SC Mixed 17.8 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 90.6 44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Erazer i72000/C057 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

System: Medion Erazer i72000/C057

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	5x
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	6x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	1x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,038 samples	6x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x
PLUS 240 GB 240GBSandiskBench 43%, 24,911 samples	1x

RAM
M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 49%, 1,126 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $370

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16