CDM CS-B/CDM/SI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCDM CS-B/CDM/SI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CS-B/CDM/SI
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '21 at 17:50
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 189
65% 117 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 275
37% 278 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 877A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47.4% Average
Lighting 60.1
Reflection 58.1
Parallax 54.5
49% 57.6 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 53.8
Splatting 47.8
44% 55.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 148 6.7 72 94 114 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24% Poor
Read 241
Write 6
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 93.8
19% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 2.3
32% 8.03 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 24%
Great: 85%
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB
177GB free
Firmware: 0-06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 79 78 79 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 79
Write 78.1
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 78
52% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 56%
Samsung HD080HJ/ 80GB
29GB free
Firmware: 0-51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 46 46 46 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 45.6
Write 41.2
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 45.8
31% 42.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB HMT451U6AFR8C-PB HMT451U6BFR8A-PB HMT451U6DFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.8% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 17.8
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 15.2
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CS-B/CDM/SI Builds (Compare 203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

System: CDM CS-B/CDM/SI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $303
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback