Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics57.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory119.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '21 at 09:12
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 81.3
1-Core 164
2-Core 325
101% 190 Pts
4-Core 646
8-Core 1,199
110% 922 Pts
64-Core 3,183
197% 3,183 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1580 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.4% Above average
Lighting 72.8
Reflection 69.9
Parallax 101
59% 81.1 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 78.4
Splatting 54
54% 67.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
482GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1749 1804 1619 1513 1538 1542 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
354% Outstanding
Read 2,573
Write 1,806
Mixed 1,740
SusWrite 1,628
433% 1,937 MB/s
4K Read 67.2
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 94.1
316% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,270
DQ Write 1,122
DQ Mixed 1,198
898% 1,197 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 354%
Great: 410%
Samsung 980 1TB
463GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2959 3388 3458 2407 1628 1613 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 70%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
149GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 105 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 102
Write 101
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 104
66% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 59%
Great: 59%
Samsung HD080HJ/ 80GB
74GB free
Firmware: ZH10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 58 58 57 57 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 57.7
Write 57.2
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 57.8
40% 54.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 33%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
28GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 7.1 11 8.5 10 9.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 19.2
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 10.1
26% 21 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 3.1
254% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMG128GX4M4E3200C16 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 62.6
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 37.1
131% 46 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 37.2
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 122%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,059 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback