Samsung Samsung DeskTop System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung Samsung DeskTop System  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG Samsung DeskTop System
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20120216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '21 at 20:47
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 81.4
1-Core 86.5
2-Core 156
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 222
29% 218 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Sanyo(144D B078) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.85% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.83 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.85%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_MTFDHBA256TDV-1AY1AABFA 256GB
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4MA314
SusWrite @10s intervals: 938 1046 1060 1069 1025 1057 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,160
Write 1,045
Mixed 995
SusWrite 1,032
238% 1,058 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 51.3
158% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 686
DQ Write 439
DQ Mixed 584
430% 570 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 184%
Great: 250%
JetFlash Transcend 4GB
0GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 25.3
Write 4.5
Mixed 4.2
10% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5273CH0-YH9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
28.2% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 8.5
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 9.9
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Samsung DeskTop System Builds (Compare 1,780 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung Samsung DeskTop System

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback