Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 13 '21 at 16:22
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 84
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 94.9
54% 81.5 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 275
29% 230 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.7% Poor
Lighting 37.7
Reflection 41.3
Parallax 38.6
31% 39.2 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 27.2
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 219 232 227 234 219 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 327
Write 335
Mixed 280
SusWrite 232
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 29.3
126% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 166
136% 194 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 102%
Kingston RBUSC180DS37256GJ 256GB
230GB free
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 150 104 105 104 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 378
Write 239
Mixed 330
SusWrite 152
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 35.4
133% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 178
143% 202 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 80%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
324GB free
Firmware: AX001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 109 110 108 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 98.3
Write 99.7
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 108
62% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$24
194GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 72 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 116
Write 116
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 72.1
70% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 70%
SAMSUNG SP2504C 250GB
206GB free, PID 0286
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.7% Very poor
Read 26.2
Write 25.9
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 16.1
31% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
ST316081 2AS 160GB
126GB free, PID 0286
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.1% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 15.7
Mixed 25
SusWrite 16.9
28% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.87 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1600 Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9W DDR3 1600 Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9W 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.6% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.5
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback