Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 217%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 238%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics210% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive416% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211001
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 10 '21 at 06:59
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 91.3
1-Core 168
2-Core 333
106% 197 Pts
4-Core 642
8-Core 1,093
105% 867 Pts
64-Core 2,298
142% 2,298 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 5113 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Lighting 314
Reflection 274
Parallax 318
256% 302 fps
MRender 317
Gravity 257
Splatting 187
200% 253 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 210%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2786 2818 1772 1787 1795 1704 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
416% Outstanding
Read 2876
Write 3,294
Mixed 3,102
SusWrite 2,110
642% 2,846 MB/s
4K Read 83.8
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 117
382% 133 MB/s
DQ Read 1,447
DQ Write 946
DQ Mixed 1,212
900% 1,202 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 416%
Great: 488%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
155GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 12,426
Write 8,238
Mixed 9714
2,246% 10,126 MB/s
4K Read 842
4K Write 409
4K Mixed 413
2,021% 555 MB/s
DQ Read 2,067
DQ Write 1,154
DQ Mixed 1,456
1,124% 1,559 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB
86GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 585 335 336 336 336 336 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,700
Write 1,135
Mixed 1,033
SusWrite 377
236% 1,061 MB/s
4K Read 58
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 72.7
240% 80.7 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 828
DQ Mixed 1,001
723% 935 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 206%
Great: 247%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
230GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 794 671 307 308 308 307 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,695
Write 1,143
Mixed 1,048
SusWrite 449
241% 1,084 MB/s
4K Read 58.5
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 72.1
240% 80.5 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 838
DQ Mixed 1,002
725% 938 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 210%
Great: 280%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
526GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 138 141 141 141 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 132
Mixed 88.9
SusWrite 136
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C19 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 61.1
MC Write 47.2
MC Mixed 46.8
148% 51.7 GB/s
SC Read 30.8
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 42.6
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 137%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,544
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback