Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 198%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 227%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics197% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive391% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211001
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateNov 04 '21 at 00:51
Run Duration301 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 87.5
1-Core 164
2-Core 324
103% 192 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 1,235
110% 931 Pts
64-Core 2,312
143% 2,312 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
197% Outstanding
Lighting 291
Reflection 248
Parallax 293
237% 277 fps
MRender 312
Gravity 235
Splatting 170
188% 239 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 197%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
441GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2683 1900 1838 1872 1854 1232 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
391% Outstanding
Read 2,844
Write 3,204
Mixed 2,710
SusWrite 1,896
600% 2,664 MB/s
4K Read 75.5
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 106
349% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,449
DQ Write 932
DQ Mixed 1,198
891% 1,193 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 391%
Great: 488%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
257GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,148
Write 9,136
Mixed 7,838
1,806% 8,041 MB/s
4K Read 769
4K Write 362
4K Mixed 167
1,570% 432 MB/s
DQ Read 1,659
DQ Write 1,081
DQ Mixed 1,311
994% 1,350 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB
86GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 744 336 336 336 336 336 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2215
Write 1,434
Mixed 1,358
SusWrite 404
300% 1,353 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 83.7
280% 99 MB/s
DQ Read 979
DQ Write 820
DQ Mixed 1,010
727% 937 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 241%
Great: 247%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
230GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1337 309 309 309 310 311 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 2,143
Write 1,452
Mixed 1,243
SusWrite 481
295% 1,330 MB/s
4K Read 59.8
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 78.7
272% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 977
DQ Write 827
DQ Mixed 1,005
725% 936 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 239%
Great: 280%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
526GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 141 142 142 141 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 175
Mixed 110
SusWrite 141
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C19 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 56.6
MC Write 45.7
MC Mixed 44.3
140% 48.9 GB/s
SC Read 30
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 40.5
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 130%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,533
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback