ZMAX MERCHANT 3500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemZMAX MERCHANT 3500  (all builds)
MotherboardPCWARE IPMH61R3
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '21 at 00:53
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 211
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 518
58% 456 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Elitegroup(1019 7B97) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.38% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 2
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.97 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.38%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3Z40107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 194 143 87 39 53 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.3% Below average
Read 200
Write 179
Mixed 177
SusWrite 106
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 14
62% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 22.7
DQ Write 78.2
DQ Mixed 1.1
15% 34 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
14GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 71 72 72 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 80.7
Write 75.3
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 72.1
51% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DATEN 4GD16 04/14 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.3% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 16.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MERCHANT 3500 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: ZMAX MERCHANT 3500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback