Lenovo 7052C2U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 7052C2U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120110
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 07 '21 at 21:19
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 153
68% 111 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 309
43% 318 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 141
Parallax 130
106% 134 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 138
Splatting 120
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 120 98 22 54 53 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.5% Above average
Read 244
Write 199
Mixed 188
SusWrite 80.1
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 22.9
89% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 139
119% 175 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 87%
WD WD2502ABYS-02B7A0 251GB
168GB free
Firmware: 02.03B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 109 111 110 112 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 69.6
Write 67.2
Mixed 52.1
SusWrite 109
55% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 64%
SanDisk SDSSDA120G 120GB
68GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 20 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 32.4
Write 13.2
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 21.3
30% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 5.7
450% 6.43 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG NT2GC64B88G0NF-CG NT2GC64B88G0NF-CG NT2GC64B88G0NF-CG 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7052C2U Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 7052C2U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $329
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback