Lenovo 7052C2U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 7052C2U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120110
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 31 '21 at 17:38
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 163
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 336
45% 334 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 1802 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Lighting 35.8
Reflection 38.5
Parallax 36.2
29% 36.8 fps
MRender 39.6
Gravity 37
Splatting 26.4
27% 34.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 309
Write 210
Mixed 235
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 25.3
97% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 158
137% 200 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 87%
WD WD2502ABYS-02B7A0 251GB
134GB free
Firmware: 02.03B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 87 88 89 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 111
Write 105
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 87.5
68% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG NT2GC64B88G0NF-CG NT2GC64B88G0NF-CG NT2GC64B88G0NF-CG 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.9% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.4
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7052C2U Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 7052C2U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $329
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback