Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z87X-UD5H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '21 at 01:15
Run Duration302 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 62.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 185
66% 117 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 614
56% 472 Pts
64-Core 525
32% 525 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 62%
Great: 84%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 183 143 225 167 191 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.2% Average
Read 256
Write 207
Mixed 219
SusWrite 182
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 21.6
58% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 56.8
DQ Mixed 77.5
62% 87.7 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 133%
Sandisk SD7TB6S256G1001 256GB
152GB free
Firmware: X3551201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 262 259 255 255 256 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 357
Write 295
Mixed 211
SusWrite 261
63% 281 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 22.1
86% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 211
174% 252 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLT8G3D1608DT2TXOB 1315 BLT8G3D1608DT2TXRG 1315 BLT8G3D1608DT2TXOB 1315 BLT8G3D1608DT2TXRG 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
44.2% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14.2
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback