Asus N53SV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus N53SV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N53SV
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '21 at 07:52
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 79.3
2-Core 155
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 296
35% 271 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 1642) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.7% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 1.4
2% 3.07 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.7%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 24 46 53 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 64
Write 70.2
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 41.7
40% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 58%
TOSHIBA MK1059GSM 1TB
439GB free, PID 022e
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 77 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 79
Write 74.2
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 76.1
91% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
44% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 14
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 13.3
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 44%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N53SV Builds (Compare 409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N53SV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback