MSI FM2-A85XMA-E35 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI FM2-A85XMA-E35 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130129
Uptime13.3 Days
Run DateNov 03 '21 at 20:25
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 136
59% 97 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 212
29% 214 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Asus(1043 8426) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 275 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.57% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 1.3
4% 3.3 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 3.8
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.57%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$45
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 71 36 25 17 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 387
Write 305
Mixed 227
SusWrite 55.2
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 7
44% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 92
DQ Mixed 35.1
43% 76.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36%
Great: 55%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
125GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 128 130 130 130 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76% Very good
Read 136
Write 144
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 128
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-038.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 7710 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 6
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2-A85XMA-E35 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI FM2-A85XMA-E35 (MS-7721)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback