Asus H81-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus H81-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130903
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 31 '21 at 23:37
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4130-$41 49,509 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 101 2-Core 178 74% 123 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 269 34% 257 Pts	64-Core 248 15% 248 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gigabyte(1458 3544) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	3.17% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 5.7 Parallax 0.7 3% 3.37 fps	MRender 5.6 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 3.3 4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.17% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 384GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 202 202 205 202 207 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	Read 448 Write 331 Mixed 278 SusWrite 208 71% 316 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 93.2 4K Mixed 43 157% 57 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 233 DQ Mixed 240 197% 286 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 111%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 383GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 123 124 126 125 123 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Read 145 Write 138 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 124 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 109%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 19GB free Firmware: 12.01C02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 40 40 41 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	24.1% Poor	Read 43 Write 44.2 Mixed 34.4 SusWrite 40.2 30% 40.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 0737 EWB4GB681PAE-16IC 8GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 17.2 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 18.4 SC Mixed 17.5 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81-PLUS Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81-PLUS - $180

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	161x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	77x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	57x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	51x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	38x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $33Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	18x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	15x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	25x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	20x
CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 11,058 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $461

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16