Asus H81-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus H81-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130903
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 18 '22 at 19:42
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4130-$43 49,509 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Memory 76.6 1-Core 97.2 2-Core 172 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 257 35% 258 Pts	64-Core 257 16% 257 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gigabyte(1458 3544) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	3.16% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 5.4 Parallax 0.7 3% 3.27 fps	MRender 5.5 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 3.3 4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.16% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 348GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 216 213 216 212 217 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	98.8% Outstanding	Read 449 Write 302 Mixed 290 SusWrite 220 70% 315 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 97.7 4K Mixed 49.8 167% 60.6 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 232 204% 306 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 111%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 359GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 157 158 161 164 163 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	98% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 152 Mixed 85.4 SusWrite 160 106% 145 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 109%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 28GB free Firmware: 12.01C02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 42 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Read 54.2 Write 54.4 Mixed 40.9 SusWrite 41.3 35% 47.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 0737 EWB4GB681PAE-16IC 8GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 17.4 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 17.7 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 87 46% 87 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81-PLUS Builds (Compare 842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81-PLUS - $180

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	161x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	77x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	57x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	51x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	38x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	18x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	15x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	25x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	20x
CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 11,058 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $461

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16