MSI MS-7A59

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics84.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star Z270 Gaming Codex X3 (MS-B913)
MotherboardMSI MS-7A59  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit farger,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170315
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 30 '21 at 21:25
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 137
2-Core 240
89% 156 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 540
72% 542 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 112
Parallax 102
86% 106 fps
MRender 95.2
Gravity 102
Splatting 99.7
81% 99 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 443 109 108 73 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 894
Write 562
Mixed 596
SusWrite 212
126% 566 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 51.6
183% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 39.2
94% 196 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 118%
Great: 157%
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$265
434GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 455 474 483 476 413 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 461
Mixed 400
SusWrite 438
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 62.2
206% 71.5 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 363
273% 364 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 126%
Great: 135%
Apricorn 512GB
476GB free
Firmware: 0128
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 216 219 222 220 215 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.3% Average
Read 207
Write 206
Mixed 200
SusWrite 209
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 26.4
86% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 20.2
DQ Write 38.7
DQ Mixed 26.9
21% 28.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 49%
Jmicron Generic 256GB
65GB free
Firmware: 8101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 380 394 401 396 387 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 356
Write 365
Mixed 291
SusWrite 373
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 26.7
87% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 109
98% 148 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 78%
Seagate ST6000NE0021-2EN11C 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: EN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 200 207 214 212 209 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 150
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 188
104% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
158% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 111%
Great: 125%
ASMT 2115 1TB
832GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 165 166 166 167 166 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 165
Write 165
Mixed 97.1
SusWrite 163
198% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
131% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 167%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 4GB
4GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.9 5 5 4.9 5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Read 19.2
Write 3.7
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 4.9
8% 8.03 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
79.8% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 24
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 31.1
SC Mixed 24.2
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7A59 Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI MS-7A59

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $576
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback