Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 90L50016MW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90L50016MW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3148
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '22 at 15:49
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 66.3
1-Core 129
2-Core 253
80% 150 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 718
70% 576 Pts
64-Core 877
54% 877 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$147
Zotac(19DA C548) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.7% Below average
Lighting 49.8
Reflection 46.3
Parallax 42.3
41% 46.1 fps
MRender 40.9
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 37.5
32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,053
Write 1,119
Mixed 597
274% 1,256 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 45.1
171% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,056
DQ Write 498
DQ Mixed 336
367% 630 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 347%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$57
64GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 73 72 76 76 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 80.5
Write 85.7
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 73
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.6% Above average
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 22.7
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 18.5
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90L50016MW Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

System: Lenovo 90L50016MW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback