Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DAP_X512DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DAP_X512DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512DAP
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210202
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateOct 29 '21 at 20:57
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 130
58% 96.3 Pts
4-Core 26.4
8-Core 259
14% 143 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 1072) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.44.05
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
5.94% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 7.9
5% 7.67 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 12
8% 9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.94%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 77 87 54 110 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 836
Write 811
Mixed 806
SusWrite 73.3
141% 632 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 94.8
4K Mixed 48.8
161% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 62.2
113% 222 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 102%
Great: 185%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
71.9% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 23.9
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 21.3
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DAP_X512DA Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DAP_X512DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback