Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DAP_X512DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.98% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DAP_X512DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512DAP
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '21 at 02:55
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 66.1
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 171
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 278
26% 216 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 1072) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.44.05
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
5.98% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 8.5
5% 7.8 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 11.9
8% 8.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.98%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 819 878 763 65 64 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 934
Write 931
Mixed 818
SusWrite 450
176% 783 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 53.4
171% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 379
DQ Mixed 400
285% 359 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 134%
Great: 185%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.6% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 24.1
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 22.3
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DAP_X512DA Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DAP_X512DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback