MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 149%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 159%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics197% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210622
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateOct 29 '21 at 13:59
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
75% 138 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 836
76% 641 Pts
64-Core 1,467
91% 1,467 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 77%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4775 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 472.39
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
197% Outstanding
Lighting 293
Reflection 243
Parallax 285
239% 274 fps
MRender 301
Gravity 236
Splatting 170
186% 236 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 197%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 536 197 197 194 194 192 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 2,001
Write 1,167
Mixed 471
SusWrite 252
213% 973 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 50.1
200% 75.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1058
DQ Write 908
DQ Mixed 627
567% 864 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 200%
Great: 236%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
718GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 432 434 437 437 438 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 435
Mixed 395
SusWrite 432
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 50.3
170% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 192
148% 203 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 109%
Great: 125%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$105
290GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 231 81 82 83 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 449
Mixed 430
SusWrite 165
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 52
173% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 208
157% 210 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 128%
Sandisk SD7SB7S512G1122 512GB
314GB free
Firmware: X3540000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 262 260 250 256 252 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 489
Write 381
Mixed 292
SusWrite 264
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 39.3
138% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 200
153% 209 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 100%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
166GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1556 829 831 831 832 834 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 1,561
Write 1,897
Mixed 1,486
SusWrite 952
332% 1,474 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 73.9
250% 91.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,255
DQ Write 990
DQ Mixed 1,115
836% 1,120 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 248%
Great: 276%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 177 176 176 176 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 144
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 174
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 100%
Great: 114%
Kingston UHS-II SD Reader 128GB
71GB free, PID 3306
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 109 110 109 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 154
Write 106
Mixed 104
SusWrite 109
154% 118 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 4.3
282% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CM4X8GC3000C15K4 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CM4X8GC3000C15K4 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
67.2% Good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 26.6
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 26.4
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,012
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback