MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 175%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 184%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics199% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '21 at 12:01
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 80.4
1-Core 149
2-Core 282
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 1,049
93% 787 Pts
64-Core 1494
92% 1494 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4775 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
199% Outstanding
Lighting 296
Reflection 254
Parallax 297
241% 282 fps
MRender 312
Gravity 238
Splatting 174
190% 241 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 199%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,081
Write 1,428
Mixed 730
310% 1,413 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 68.4
251% 92.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,291
DQ Write 1,035
DQ Mixed 784
690% 1,037 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
722GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 440 442 443 444 442 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 431
Mixed 400
SusWrite 441
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 92.6
4K Mixed 51.5
170% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 196
152% 209 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 110%
Great: 125%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$105
497GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 460 461 463 463 463 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 453
Mixed 428
SusWrite 460
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 53.3
178% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 218
164% 221 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 114%
Great: 128%
Sandisk SD7SB7S512G1122 512GB
314GB free
Firmware: X3540000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 235 249 215 225 252 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 427
Mixed 341
SusWrite 259
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 42.8
151% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 198
155% 214 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 100%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
258GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1574 829 831 831 835 836 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 1,562
Write 1,912
Mixed 1481
SusWrite 956
333% 1,478 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 79.6
275% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,384
DQ Write 1,096
DQ Mixed 1,208
913% 1,229 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 261%
Great: 276%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 174 176 178 176 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 123
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 174
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CM4X8GC3000C15K4 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CM4X8GC3000C15K4 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
MC Read 36
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 35.4
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.8
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 37.3
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 7 144 27" 1280 720 GSM5B7F 27GL850
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,012
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback