Medion MD34951

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedion MD34951  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B460H6-EM
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200519
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 28 '21 at 20:20
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 216
84% 145 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 716
67% 559 Pts
64-Core 1,024
63% 1,024 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Zotac(19DA 9617) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
137% Outstanding
Lighting 193
Reflection 178
Parallax 170
157% 180 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 151
Splatting 132
126% 157 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 137%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme E12-512G-PHISON-SSD-B16-BB1 512GB
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1180 496 502 505 512 514 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
181% Outstanding
Read 1,094
Write 2,015
Mixed 1,335
SusWrite 618
287% 1,265 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 65.6
207% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 862
DQ Write 708
DQ Mixed 757
574% 776 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 181%
Great: 181%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
659GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 177 176 174 177 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 148
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 175
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
114% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57% Above average
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.8
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 20.1
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 57%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD34951 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO

System: Medion MD34951

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $598
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback