Lenovo 10SGS3UC00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10SGS3UC00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3132
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '21 at 23:23
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Memory 84
1-Core 149
2-Core 297
96% 177 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 1,056
97% 811 Pts
64-Core 1,376
85% 1,376 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 3132) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5.86% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 8.9
5% 8.23 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 12.2
8% 9.27 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.86%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,308
Write 1593
Mixed 1,411
322% 1,437 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 72.6
239% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,267
DQ Write 898
DQ Mixed 1,027
782% 1,064 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 295%
Seagate Expansion 250GB
30GB free
Firmware: 0712
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 52.8
Write 53.6
Mixed 28.2
33% 44.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 50%
SABRENT DISK00 500GB
9GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 42.1
Write 15.8
Mixed 33.6
36% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 176%
SABRENT DISK01 500GB
22GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 38.1
Write 52.4
Mixed 40.4
58% 43.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 155%
SABRENT DISK02 500GB
96GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 67.3
Write 59.2
Mixed 37.6
67% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 162%
SABRENT DISK03 500GB
31GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 52.6
Write 52.5
Mixed 36.8
60% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 185%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.3% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 12.5
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.1
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10SGS3UC00 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 10SGS3UC00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $473
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback