Acer Veriton M680G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Veriton M680G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M680G
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20100527
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateOct 26 '21 at 13:09
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 73.3
1-Core 59.3
2-Core 114
51% 82.2 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 181
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Palit(1569 1180) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.3% Poor
Lighting 29.7
Reflection 30
Parallax 36.4
24% 32 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 35.9
Splatting 29.4
28% 34.3 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 193 205 172 172 175 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.5% Above average
Read 180
Write 176
Mixed 173
SusWrite 178
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 27
88% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 179
134% 180 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 129%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
44GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 90 22 19 17 18 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.4% Average
Read 184
Write 179
Mixed 169
SusWrite 53
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 24.2
75% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 160
126% 175 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5584-005.A00LF 0198 99U5584-005.A00LF 0198 9905474-060.A00LF 0198 99U5584-005.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1334, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
30.9% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 11
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 8.1
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M680G Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M680G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback