Avell 1555 Iron MX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics75.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive26.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAvell 1555 Iron MX  (all builds)
MotherboardAvell 1555 Iron MX
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '21 at 19:08
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 80
1-Core 120
2-Core 223
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 600
63% 503 Pts
64-Core 610
38% 610 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1035) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.5% Very good
Lighting 90.5
Reflection 120
Parallax 93.2
74% 101 fps
MRender 92.2
Gravity 93.6
Splatting 101
79% 95.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison SM280128GPTC15T-S114-110 256GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM11.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 67 47 36 71 56 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.3% Poor
Read 443
Write 276
Mixed 133
SusWrite 58.9
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 9
13% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 58%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
113GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 37 31 34 35 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 164
Write 68.2
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 36.6
98% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.2
88% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
79.4% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 25.2
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 26.5
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1555 Iron MX Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Avell 1555 Iron MX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback