Avell 1555 Iron MX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics75.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAvell 1555 Iron MX  (all builds)
MotherboardAvell 1555 Iron MX
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '21 at 18:51
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 118
2-Core 208
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 582
61% 489 Pts
64-Core 593
37% 593 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1035) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.8% Very good
Lighting 91
Reflection 121
Parallax 93.5
74% 102 fps
MRender 92.4
Gravity 93.5
Splatting 102
79% 95.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison SM280128GPTC15T-S114-110 256GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM11.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 56 48 32 61 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.3% Below average
Read 152
Write 14.5
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 61.4
14% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 20.6
87% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 48.1
DQ Write 89.2
DQ Mixed 144
88% 93.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 58%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
113GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 39 32 34 38 35 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 163
Write 74.1
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 38.4
96% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.5
126% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
78.4% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 24.8
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 25.5
72% 25 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1555 Iron MX Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Avell 1555 Iron MX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback