Asus M5A78L-M LX3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
CPU throttled at 85% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M LX3  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130419
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 22 '21 at 11:47
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 85%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 86.7
1-Core 53.1
2-Core 106
53% 82 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 244
27% 212 Pts
64-Core 243
15% 243 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Zotac(19DA 730B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 368.81
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
4.83% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 7.4
5% 5.93 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 7.1
5% 5.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.83%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
166GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 61 61 59 55 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 84.9
Write 87.4
Mixed 44
SusWrite 58
50% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 59%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 52 56 60 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 75.2
Write 61.7
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 54.8
44% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 85%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
199GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 62 62 60 57 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 68.2
Write 39.8
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 58.9
39% 52.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB
904GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 52 54 57 60 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 86.4
Write 107
Mixed 64
SusWrite 56.5
58% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
31.3% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 9.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 10
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M LX3 Builds (Compare 1,350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M LX3 - $147

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $324
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback