Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-EP43T-USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EP43T-USB3  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '22 at 08:41
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5300-$59
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
40.6% Average
Memory 67.6
1-Core 40.4
2-Core 80.3
41% 62.8 Pts
4-Core 81.8
8-Core 79.6
11% 80.7 Pts
64-Core 79.1
5% 79.1 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
XFX(1682 2931) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.28% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 3.6
0% 2.97 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 5.3
4% 4.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.28%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 43 73 24 2.7 24 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.9% Below average
Read 202
Write 155
Mixed 156
SusWrite 33.9
30% 137 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 20.3
81% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 30.9
DQ Write 58.7
DQ Mixed 30.7
27% 40.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 94%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
198GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 102 105 102 104 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 102
Write 105
Mixed 52.9
SusWrite 104
67% 91 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.7
13% 4.47 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EP43T-USB3 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EP43T-USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback