MSI Z68S-G43 (G3) (MS-7750)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMSI MS-7750
MotherboardMSI Z68S-G43 (G3) (MS-7750)  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '21 at 21:12
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$187
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 95.7
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 205
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 528
55% 443 Pts
64-Core 525
32% 525 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 81%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
EVGA(3842 2662) 2GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.7% Poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 32.2
19% 27.6 fps
MRender 33.8
Gravity 29.5
Splatting 26.6
24% 30 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 494 495 497 497 496 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 522
Write 496
Mixed 466
SusWrite 464
110% 487 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 65
224% 82.4 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 368
278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 136%
Great: 133%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
687GB free
Firmware: AX0R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 104 104 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 84.2
Write 85.5
Mixed 31
SusWrite 97.9
54% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 62%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075 750GB
182GB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 6.2 14 7.6 22 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.7% Very poor
Read 34.4
Write 29.4
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 15.4
32% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 30%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
24GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 7.5 8.9 9.7 9.2 10 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 18
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 9.4
23% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.2
150% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
67.5% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 21.9
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 21
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 54.9
73% 54.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68S-G43 (G3) (MS-7750) Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI Z68S-G43 (G3) (MS-7750)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $414
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback