bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory10.6 GB free of 14 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '21 at 16:45
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8272CL
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 60.8
1-Core 85
2-Core 171
59% 106 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 328
42% 318 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 149 150 143 132 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 401
Write 142
Mixed 234
SusWrite 146
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 22.6
121% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 65.9
DQ Write 13.1
DQ Mixed 23.3
21% 34.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 77%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 30GB
25GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 219 197 204 175 229 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 395
Write 396
Mixed 391
SusWrite 202
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 30.4
98% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 64.8
DQ Write 66.8
DQ Mixed 66.4
50% 66 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 14GB
0, 0 MHz
1024, 13312 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.1% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 19.8
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback