bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory11 GB free of 14 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '21 at 17:17
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8171M
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 50.6
1-Core 70
2-Core 146
49% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 280
37% 277 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 134 144 133 115 163 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 402
Write 133
Mixed 200
SusWrite 139
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 15.5
64% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 65.6
DQ Write 14.1
DQ Mixed 23.2
21% 34.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 77%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 30GB
25GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 145 175 148 139 229 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 396
Write 396
Mixed 394
SusWrite 167
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 11.8
40% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 64.7
DQ Write 65.1
DQ Mixed 65.1
49% 65 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 14GB
0, 0 MHz
1024, 13312 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.4% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 19
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.17 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback