Monster ABRA A7 V9.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMonster ABRA A7 V9.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A7 V9.2
Memory18.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateOct 19 '21 at 14:25
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 83.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 241
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 634
69% 546 Pts
64-Core 811
50% 811 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 872B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9613
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Lighting 40.6
Reflection 48.3
Parallax 38.5
33% 42.5 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 27.4
28% 35.7 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MU031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 145 144 83 109 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 463
Write 325
Mixed 364
SusWrite 121
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 33.7
112% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 144
122% 180 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5663-007.A00G 859B CT8G4SFS8266.C8FD1 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.8% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 21.8
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 22.2
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A7 V9.2 Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A7 V9.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback