Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2920 1,586 User benchmarks, average bench 31% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Memory 59 1-Core 18.1 2-Core 37.9 28% 38.3 Pts	4-Core 75.4 8-Core 73.8 10% 74.6 Pts	64-Core 75.1 5% 75.1 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1B0A 2213) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.57% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.4 Parallax 0.7 0% 0.5 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.57% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ezcool S280 240GB 722 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: EZ2021 SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 211 204 207 205 208 MB/s Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.5% Above average	Read 250 Write 225 Mixed 224 SusWrite 210 51% 227 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 42 4K Mixed 20.9 85% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 86.8 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 41.6 57% 102 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF 8GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.8% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 9.4 24% 8.37 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 3.9 10% 3.5 GB/s	Latency 131 31% 131 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N2910IntelBench 30%, 108 samples	12x
Celeron N2920IntelBench 31%, 1,586 samples	9x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	21x

RAM
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 19,285 samples	8x
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 12,200 samples	4x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	2x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16