Seneca pro777745

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSeneca pro777745  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte H110TN
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '21 at 19:49
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 215
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 374
50% 375 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
EVGA(3842 2738) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 2.8
3% 3.9 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.2
3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 236 233 289 324 330 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 424
Write 268
Mixed 272
SusWrite 281
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 40.3
136% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 183
168% 257 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C16-16GRS Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
75% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 24.1
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 21.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical pro777745 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Seneca pro777745

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback